Thank you for visting my movie review site.

I know I'm not as established as the other sites out there (afterall, I just started), but if you enjoy what I do, please stay tuned and I will work on delivering the goods.
Please leave feed back with your thoughts about my posts. One of the great things about 'comments' is that we can have discussions. Your thoughts are most welcomed. Thanks again, and enjoy.

Latest Movie Review

District 9(2009)

Not what I expected, but good stuff



Short

A great movie that will surprise all who venture to watch it. It is a sci-fi drama that is filmed for a general audience. Movie goers of all breeds will be able to enjoy this film due to its innovative filming style and its very accessible story. Do not go in expecting two hours of alien action and deep science fiction concepts, this is a movie about a very serious human issue as told through the use of xenophobia. See it at your earliest convinience! Period.



Full

Sigh. You know studio execs are kicking themselves in the rear right now after denying Blomkamp the opportunity to direct the 'Halo' movie. Neill has achieved in his film debut what many directors will fail to achieve in a lifetime of filmmaking. He has made a movie that will blow the panties off of any movie goer. Action fan or no action fan, sci-fi fan or realism fan, drama fan or comedy fan. The only audience that may miss their mark with this movie are the romance fans; but there are enough waste of time movies for them to watch that they don’t matter. If you haven’t gotten the hint yet, "District 9" was fantastic.

The plot

"District 9" takes place in a contemporary South Africa that is much like our own South Africa, with one important difference – an alien mothership descended over Johannesburg 28 years ago and promptly broke down, stranding more than a million crustacean like aliens on Earth.
After being rerouted to earth, a group of ‘worker’ aliens settle in Africa. Being feared and misunderstood by humans, they are put into a ghetto, where the insect-like alien race is mistreated. Worse yet, behind the scenes, the race is being subjected to experiments by the human race to better understand the aliens and how to use their weapon technology. After 20 years of habitation, the aliens are ready to leave earth and go home. With the help of Wikus Van De Merwe (Sharlto Copley)--an agent of the MNU, an organization that regualtes the alien situation--this might be possible. But will the aliens have enough time to blast off before the military catches wind of the plan?
Another version of the plot can be found in history, as it is roughly based on the apartheid situation in South Africa.
Apartheid Conflict

Reasons to see it

The animation! I don’t even need to mention the special effects of this film. People have already been talking up Blokamp since his name was put on the movie. Though he has really only done commercials before "District 9", his seamless integration of CGI with reality was already legend. So suffice it to say that the special effects are great in this film.

The filming style. A large portion of the film is shot as a mock-documentary. For those who are skeptical and are scared by the "Cloverfield" incident, please note that this style is nothing like that. It is well done and innovative. The reason this film fails to be a standard sci-fi thriller is because it feels so real. With the aforementioned animation, and the gritty feel of watching this on the history channel, it’s only my knowledge that this stuff does not exist that prevents me from believing it as real. The realism of it all sucks the audience in and makes us not only care about the alien conflict as if it was ‘Hotel Rawanda’ but make us angry at our own race for the mistreatment of a species we can’t really identify with. Well done, sir.

Which brings me to my next point. This movie obviously has the potential to be ‘preachy’, after all it is based on the apartheid situation. But let me assure you, Neill succeeds again. With his elegant direction style, you never really feel the preach. He doesn’t insult the audience by telling us that there is a message here. He simply conveys what seems to be a true story about a conflict, and allows the audience to pull out whatever messages they feel. And I assure you, you will pull some messages from this movie, which just adds to its substance and value.

The action. Wow. Though a large part of the movie is development of the conflict and characters, there is a decent portion of the movie that is dedicated to not-over-the-top action. Let me tell you now, you will be stunned. The visual effects, the innovative technology, and the sound will have you at the edge of your seat. Though the action isn’t on the level of the 'Matrix', it doesn’t have to be. With the realistic tone of the movie and the convincing illusions that it is real, a simple gun shot into the grass wil have you saying 'holy sh!t'. After all, if you saw a gun shot in real life, that’s what you would say. So amplify that simple gunshot into a 30 minute sequence of alien weapon fire, and I promise you will be stunned.

Speaking of the alien weapons. Can I get another 'wow'! Though any gamer who plays first person shooters will recognize some of the weapon concepts, actually seeing them on screen and in action in a realistic setting is phenomenal. Actually, as the weapons are the biggest surprise in the movie and one of the most enjoyable aspects, I will say nothing further about them. See the movie for yourself and be blown away.

A final note to make, is that with the first time director comes the first time actors of this film, all who give outstanding performances. My hat is off to the cast of newbies, especially Sharlto Copley, who plays both our protagonist and antagonist.

The Negatives

This movie has a lot of depth and the story could be told over the course of four hours (and if Jackson had his way, it might have been). But since the film is fit into a succinct two hour time slot, there are a few things that felt rushed. Some character development and some conflict development to be specific. Do they take away from the movie? Not even close. But if I can’t step back and nitpick at things, people will never respect my opinion as being unbiased.

Probably the worst aspect of the movie is the prospect of a 'District 9' sequel. Though the movie does not blatantly end with, ‘see you next year’, there is a big enough window left open such that any money hungry studio could pull something out of it. Would I love another 'District 9'? Yes. Have I lost complete faith in Hollywood’s ability to make sequels? Yes.

In summary…

A must see of the summer. I will even be so bold as to say that it is the first actually good blockbuster that we have had this summer (500 hundred days of summer does not count as a blockbuster).
Full Review!

Latest Cinema Commentary

The Last Airbender!

Should we be excited?
I hate M. Night Shyamalan! After the 'Sixth Sense" and "Unbreakable", he has been allowed to make movies out of any dream that he has. He wakes up in the mourning, writes down his dream, and some studio funds it. As a result, we have been fooled into seeing ‘The Village’, ‘Signs’, and worst of all ‘Lady in the water’. But that being said, I am stoked for his new movie: ‘The Last Airbender’.
Read Full



Spartacus = '300' visuals + HBO's 'Rome' plot style + 'Gladiator' storyline

Let the bodies hit the floor
Finally a 'Rome' replacement. Despite your hopes, 'Sparacus: Blood and Sand' is not a movie title, it is the title of Starz's new series. Much like the deceased HBO series by the name of 'Rome', 'Spartacus will take us through a likely fictional history of the Roman empire.
.Read Full



'Pirates of the Caribbean 4'...Booooo!


When I think Hollywood just wants to make everything into a trilogy, I find out that 4 is the new 3. Bringing about the same worries as 'Spiderman 4' , so too does 'Pirates of the Caribbean 4'
Read Full Full Review!

Finally the 'Avatar' Trailer!


I have to admit, I'm a little underwhelmed. Not that the movie doesn't look off-the-chain, crazy-cool. Or that the animation isn't awe inspiring. But as you all have heard, this movie is supposed to be a cinema revolution that shakes our very foundations of reality. Sure 2 minutes isn't really enough time to warp reality, but the trailer didn't even hint at being a revolution. I'm still undeniably stoked! But I guess seeing the movie in 3-D at the Imax (which it was optimized for) might be the only way to fully appreciate its cinema changing aspects.


Full Review!

The Last Airbender!

Should we be excited?
I hate M. Night Shyamalan! After the 'Sixth Sense" and "Unbreakable", he has been allowed to make movies out of any dream that he has. He wakes up in the mourning, writes down his dream, and some studio funds it. As a result, we have been fooled into seeing ‘The Village’, ‘Signs’, and worst of all ‘Lady in the water’. But that being said, I am stoked for his new movie: ‘The Last Airbender’.

First off, this story isn't his own original, bullsh#t invention, it’s based on an anime that appears in the standard Saturday morning line up. Do I watch Saturday morning cartoons? Regretfully no. But I was in a dentist office recently and this cartoon was playing on the television while I was waiting to have my face wrecked. As I watched the cartoon, I realized something, it was pretty dang cool. I generally hate the new mix of cartoons in the world and am upset that my children will be brought into it; but this ‘Avatar: The last Airbender’ cartoon caught my eye. The episode I was watching was ‘Day of the Black Sun’ (season 3: episodes 10 and 11). I literally said to myself, ‘this could make a cool movie’. Literally! And then boom! Here it is. I went to see G.I. Joe this weekend, and one of the preceding trailers was what you see below. Do I think M. Night will do it justice? NO. But do I hope? Yes. See the teaser trailer below, and let me know what you think.



Full Review!

Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince(2009)Not bad, but not the best

A Dude's Review
Not bad, but not the best






Short

After 6 years, our favorite trio of children wizards have grown up. I say this not only plot wise, but in terms of acting as well. One of the great aspects of the newest installment of the Harry Potter franchise is that the children have really come into their own as actors and are really selling their parts. This talent is necessary to make the semi-'love story' plot of the 'Half Blood Prince' compelling enough to watch for two hours. However, the acting isn't the only highlight of the movie; the special effects are great, the score is wonderful, and the new characters are a delight. But with little action and literally only half of the plot from the book, the story feels incomplete and may have trouble holding the attention of children. Definitely not the best installment in the 'Potter' series, but worth a look if you know what you're getting into.




Full


Though I hate the Harry Potter franchise, the last two installments have been very enjoyable for me, primaily due to the talent of director Yates. But unlike the last movie which really got my attention, this one fails for quite a few reasons. 'Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince' does so many things right that I have trouble holding what will likely be an unpopular opinion; it wasn’t that good. Since movies are always going to be worse than the books, there is no point in going down that road of criticism. For Harry Potter fans, the book is obviously better and this movie is nothing compared to it. However, when rating this movie relative to other movies and the previous members of the franchise, there are still a lot of things that are done poorly.

The plot

Harry Potter and his friends have returned to Hogwarts for what will be another year of adventure and near death experiences. With the Death Eaters on the loose, and Voldemort returning to power, security at the school is high. But not high enough. As Harry and Dumbledore search for secrets of Tom Riddles past, the school is infiltrated by an agent of the Dark Lord. Will the children wizard be able to save Hogwarts again, or will disaster finally strike?

Reasons to see it

The acting of Radcliffe, Watson, and Grint are simply great. The young adults have really grown as actors and are really convincing in thier roles. Every joke, tear, and facial expression can be interpreted by the audience without a word. That's something kid actors don't often get right (though I guess they really aren't kids anymore...)

Another character that cannot go without mention is Draco Malfoy (Tom Felton). Though he is the bad guy and does nothing to deserve your love, he truly shines in this film as a multi-dimensional character that you can feel for. Being transformed from his one dimensional villain character of the past, we see Malfoy express an array of emotions and actually have a large amount of screen time with his own plot arc. The exchanges with Harry are chilling, and his inner battle for acceptance is heart breaking. Overall, a gem in the new film.

Along these lines, the love stories told in this film are really enjoyable. After all, they have to be; the relationship forming between students is 3/4 of the story here (though this is not the case for the book). You truly are transported to your young, innocent days of early ‘snugging’ as these kids portray the adolescent drama of teenage love. And for those of us who are Ron Weasley fans, prepare to have a stupid smirk put on your face multiple times throughout the film.

Another major factor to mention with any 'Potter' film is the visual effects. Let me reassure you, they are superb. From small spells to ginormous magic, the visuals of the film are awe inspiring. Though magic in general has a tendency to remind audiences that they are watching a movie, the CGI does not contribute to this. I could almost believe what I was seeing was real. Along the lines of effects, the score of the film was fantastic as well. Though the music has been pretty solid from film to film, composer Nicholas Hooper really takes the familiar melodies and amps them up for this new installment, giving everything a fresh feel (though I do not want to take too much of this credit from Yates).

The Negatives

First and foremost, the film was…boring. Don’t get me wrong, if this was set up as a romantic comedy, the movie would likely harbor a different opinion from me. But the fact that it is not only 'Harry Potter', but 'Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince' made me expect a great deal more action. I tell you now, there was literally only one scene that I could call full fledged action (longer than 40 seconds). There are two shorter scenes that could be seen as action, but really only account for 2 minutes collectively in a 2 hour film. Every previous film has had its action sequences, especially the climactic ones. I really felt the lack of action by the end during the climax scene. Though the most important events occur by the fanale (book readers know what I refer to), there is no climactic battle. Was one necessary? Yes! Not only is there a giant wizard battle in the book, but the movie needed it to help explain the final events more clearly. I'm not a warmonger, if you watch the movie, you'll see what I mean.

Along these lines, the movie fails multiple times to make certain situations clear. You are often left asking, 'why don’t they do this', 'why did they do that', 'where did this character go', 'should I have read the book?' Don’t worry, you aren’t alone. Do you know why we have these questions? Because half of the story is missing. Namely…Voldemort. For a character who has so much verbal presence in this film and half of the chapters written about him in the book (in fact I think the “Half-Blood Prince” is often referred to as 'Voldemort's Book'), he does not make a single appearance in this movie. I know, bull! Well don’t believe me and see the movie for yourself.

But on an understanding note, we all have to accept that the movie would have been 12 hours long if everything was included from the book and may have been 3 hours long if they added the necessary action sequences; however, there are still things that the movie fails to do that any responsible movie must. This is beyond the book and beyond what I would like to see, this is about proper story telling. There are many aspects of the story (almost everything outside of the love) that the film fails to make me concerned about. This wouldn’t be so bad if the details weren’t crucial to the plot.
One, the Half-Blood Prince. The name is in the title and is mentioned a hand full of times in the film, but never once does the audience realize that it is relevant. The fact that the novel exists is no excuse for a director as talented as Yates to take for granted that the audience understands. We don’t, you have to tell us if something is important and if we should give two ‘bleeps’. Again, since the story is mainly about the love, I guess this is’nt too detracting, but it is a pretty critical part of what makes 'The Half-Blood Prince about the Half-Blood Prince.
Two, death. When death occurs in a movie, the audience should care. If Harry dies, children should be racking with tears in their seats (P.S. Harry doesn’t die). But this movie fails to make us care about the demise of pretty important characters. That is bad story telling.

In summary…

...Though the movie excels at telling the story that it wants to tell, the love story, it fails at telling the story that the audience needs to hear, the rise of the Dark Lord. Despite great acting, great visuals, and great characters, it lacks for better action, more drama, and a proper ending. Regardless of what I’ve said, you will see 'Harry Potter' if you want to see it. But if you are on the fence, go see it with my criticisms in mind, and you will likely enjoy it. I personally think this is a movie best watched with expectations defined.
Full Review!

Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince(2009)Not bad, but not the best




Spoiler Grumbles
WARNING: Please do not continue reading unless you have either seen the movie or do not mind having it spoiled.



No Wizard fight! Really? I know 'Harry' isn’t about the action, but every 'Potter' movie has at least one climactic scene. This movie did not. Dumbledore’s death isn’t even climactic, and that’s the passing of a bawler. I expected him to go down in a blaze of glory destroying half of England in the process. Instead, he just gets blasted out the window after begging like a pansy. Worse yet, it turns out that there is in fact a sweet battle surrounding his death in the book. I knew those Death Eaters weren’t being built up for no reason, they actually throw down in the end. Why was that left out? Wait, wait, I actually already have the answer from the director himself. The scene was left out because there is more fighting in the next movie and he didn’t want to bore the audience with two similar movies in a row. Well, thank you for your consideration Yates, but do I need to remind you that we all paid very handsomely to see the same exact movie three times in a row; it was called ‘Lord of the Rings’. We love that stuff. Nobody is going to be upset if there is a 10 minute wizard fight in one movie and then a 10 minute fight in the next one.

And where do the Death Eaters go in the end. They just kill Dumbledore and roll out? Doubtful. I’m sure in the book they are chased off by the other wizards (I haven't actually read the books). Another plot hole that the wizard fight could have clarified.

Along the lines of dropping important/cool portions of the book; where was Voldemort. This book is often referred to as 'Voldemort’s book', because half of the chapters are about him. Well he didn’t even make half a minute of this movie. Aside from his name being dropped a handful of times, he was nowhere to be found. What’s up with that. I want to see Voldemort bust some stuff up. In the book he goes around off-ing Muggles for fun and recruiting rogue wizards/witches to his army. That’s the kind of stuff I want to see. Speaking of which, why does Harry even bother having a personal life. With the Dark Lord out amassing an army to kill him, why doesn’t Harry spend his entire time trying to find and destroy Voldemort? Whatever happened to Dumbledore’s army (whatever good they did Dumbledore)? Harry and his wizard peeps should be out equalizing justice. Oh but Dude, they’re just kids, they can’t fight Voldemort. Really, did you see the last 5 movies?

So, try this one on for thought. Why is it that the world of wizards is so forgetful? I know they’re all old, but I sort of got the vibe that wizards were immune to Alzheimer’s. Even my grandpa remembers that there was a ‘time turner’ in the 3rd 'Harry Potter'. Where is it now? How useful would it be to turn back time and save some lives. Really useful, that’s the answer.

Along these lines, why is it that nobody remembered the Horcrux until now. If I was even a half educated Wizard and I knew that Voldemort was still alive somehow, that’s the first thing I would have thought of. You’re going to tell me that this little trick of immortality never crossed the minds of the faculty at Hogwarts?
Okay let’s give Dumbledore the benefit of the doubt and say that the time turner is broken and that the Horcrux is rare knowledge. Guess what, he still sucks-@$$. Dumbledore can whirl up a flaming tornado, teleport across hundreds of miles, and be head wizard, but he can’t cross a puddle of water. Do you remember this? In the cave of Voldemort’s Horcrux, Dumbledore looks forlorn as he realizes that between them and their destination is a mini-lake about 20 feet across. Are you telling me that Dumbledore had no magic up his sleeve to cross this short distance? I guess not. Another ridiculous point in the cave was Voldemort’s Horcrux. Being the most powerful evil wizard in the world and having the power to create multiple Horcrux, the best he could do to protect his soul was by putting it in a bowl of dirty water? Ha Ha, the unpleasant taste will stop them from destroying me. Come on Voldemort, really? Weak.

You know what one of my big questions is: Why is Hogwarts still attended? Think about it. Would you send your kid to a school where students died every year, faculty were frequently caught in conspiracy, the campus was surrounded by dangerous creatures (trolls, spiders, centaurs, etc.) and open student violence was tolerated (Harry nearly kills Malfoy, spells are practiced on each other as a joke). This is the worst school ever. But before I waste time ranting, allow me to direct you to another post that enumerates the reasons better than I can.

Link to '7 reasons why hogwarts is the worst school'

Full Review!

'Pirates of the Caribbean 4'...Booooo!


When I think Hollywood just wants to make everything into a trilogy, I find out that 4 is the new 3. Bringing about the same worries as 'Spiderman 4' , so too does 'Pirates of the Caribbean 4'.

Disney refuses to let a lucrative franchise end on a good note, and decides to make a forth. Actually, my mistake; 'Pirates 3' was terrible. In that case, I guess '4' can do no harm aside from annoy us. Scratch that, it is rumored that 'Pirates 4' is actually going to be the start of a new trilogy. Sigh, time to retire to the bomb shelter.
Whatever the case, Disney has pinned their director, surprising as it might be, as Rob Marshall. Who's that? Rob Marshall directed such little films as, oh, 'Chicago' and 'Memoirs of a Geisha' (ring any bells?). There's no denying that this director has talent, but I don't think even Peter Jackson could rescue the wreck that Gore Verbinski and company left the franchise in. Granted the final two movies grossed more than me or my family will ever be worth, we can all admit that they sort of sucked. But I guess Leterrier rescued the 'Hulk', which some thought impossible. So I guess we'll just have to see what else happens with this movie before we can make our judgements (ex. casting).
All I can say is that there is no 'Priates' without Jack Sparrow aka Johnny Depp in one of his most amazing roles. So until he is signed on, I don't know if I should run around spreading the prophecy of doom just yet.

What do you think, can an Oscar nominated director rebuild the franchise?
Full Review!

Spartacus = '300' visuals + HBO's 'Rome' plot style + 'Gladiator' storyline

Let the bodies hit the floor
Finally a 'Rome' replacement. Despite your hopes, 'Sparacus: Blood and Sand' is not a movie title, it is the title of Starz's new series. Much like the deceased HBO series by the name of 'Rome', 'Spartacus will take us through a likely fictional history of the Roman empire.

I don't know much else about it, but watching the trailer should help you fill in most of the details by yourself. See trailer here
It seems that the show will essentially steal the premise of 'Gladiator', throw the '300' visual style on it, and run it for as many seasons as fans support it. I personally am all for this series. I was a big fan of 'Rome' and was disappointed when it was cancelled. But unlike Rome, this series will likely give us more of the good stuff, action. Hopefully the characters are as lovable as my boy Titus Pullo (Ray Stevenson).
Full Review!

Action sequences that blew me away and left me searching for my pants

Over-the-top 'Die Hard 4' sceneAfter watching 'Transformers 2' and anticipating 'GI Joe', I got to thinking about all of the great action sequences I’ve seen in past movies. To be honest, for as many action movies as there have been, there haven’t been that many action sequences that really made me say, “wow, that’s some crazy sh**.” I realized this fact when I watched 'Transformers 2'; though the movie was pretty much non-stop action, there was only one scene in which I was on the edge of my seat frothing at the mouth. And so I got to thinking, what makes an action scene more awesome than another. In trying to figure out the answer I scanned through some of my favorite sequences from the movies I could recall. Though I haven’t quite come up with an answer, I have come up with a list of my top 10 favorite action sequences. Please read on and let me know what you think. Feel free to make me aware of deserving candidates that were not on this list (remember top 10, not top 25). The list isn’t in any order, because ranking these would have been pulling hairs for me.




Forest fight in ‘Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen’

Though the movie has gotten a lot of flack since it has been released, there is no one that can deny that the forest fight with Optimus prime against 3 decepticons was off the chain (not even the blind, as the sound effects were pretty crazy too). This was the single greatest sequence in the ‘Transformers 2’ movie. If the theater played this scene on loop, I wouldn’t even know what to do with myself. I’d be unable to leave my seat and would probably have a stroke. This scene works for sooo many reasons. One, good guy outnumbered by his opponents; the underdog. Two, swords! Everyone knows that a fight is ten times cooler if there is a sword involved. Think about how much better ‘Push’ would have been if somebody had a sword (‘Harry Potter’ too for that matter). Three, a bawler line followed by bloodshed, a.k.a. “I’ll take you all on" soon followed by gratuitous, animated, robot, violence. This scene had it all.

Train fight in 'Spider man 2'

Again, there are a lot of Spiderman haters out there, but let me just make you aware that ‘Spiderman 2’ is the best marvel superhero movie behind 'Iron Man'. So haters, get yourselves into perspective. As being one of the best superhero movies, ‘Spiderman 2’ also has one of the greatest fight sequences I have ever seen. The fight was fast and clever and didn’t relish itself with slow motion capture. The fight went down as I would imagine it to have in real life with both characters pulling out all the stops to topple the other. One sequence in particular that was sweet was when spidy webbed ock’s tentacles and ock says “Fu** this” and uses the move against spidy to throw him through an over head bridge. But wait, the great counter is that spidy has an agile move of his own and slips right through the grates of the bridge, pops out the other side and takes the villain over the edge of the train. Awesome! This action sequence is also accentuated by the high speed of the train upon which they fight. This allowed for the cool ducking under bridges and webbing the train to reboard when kicked off.

‘The Matix’ lobby shoot out

If I need to enumerate on the reasons why this scene is awesome, you reader are simply a lost cause. This scene was in fact the coolest action scene in any movie anywhere prior to 1998. The innovative use of slow motion, the physics defying protagonists, and the endless army of poorly aimed automatic weapons. Neo is the only character that Keanu Reeves’ monotonic, expressionless, cardboard character has done incredible justice for since ‘Bill and Ted’s Excellent Adventure’.

The final Darth Maul fight in ‘Star wars episode I’

Though I have my love for Vader and I’ve come to appreciate Palpatine and Dukoo as well, I still vote Darth Maul the coolest sith in the series. He has all of 15 minutes of on screen time in the entire franchise, and the impression he made was so strong that many people have put him as a favorite character (as judged by his presence in many of the video games, T-shirts, top action figure sales, etc). Why was he so popular? Was it the neat black and red tattoos, the horns of the Zabrak, the double sided lightsaber? Yeah it was all of those things too, but most importantly it was because he was played by Ray Park. Is Park a famous actor? No, but he is a great martial arts practitioner. As a result, we got to see the best saber wielding the franchise has to offer. With the flipping and the fast blade attacks, Maul’s double-team fight is a thing of legend. Even more intense than the 2 vs 1 fight, is the segment of the fight that I call “Obi’s Rage” in which Obi Wan Kenobi goes ape sh** on Maul after he kills Qui Gon. The sword wielding is blazing fast and super athletic. It was a joy to watch then and still brings me amusement on Youtube now. As an end note, Maul also has one of the best sith entrances to a fight: the doors slowly slide open, he pulls back his cloak hood, and lights one, then two sides of his saber. Bawler!

The dino fight of “King Kong”

Though 'King Kong' was not as well received by the general public as it was by me, I disagree with most in saying that Peter Jackson dropped the ball after the LOTR trilogy. ‘King Kong’ has all of the same Jackson motifs that we have come accustom to in his previous movies; the dark tribes, the overly long moments of facial emotion, the great story telling, the fantastic CGI, and most importantly his love of long, intense action. This is exemplified in his ten minute action sequence in which King Kong fights not one, not two, but three tyrannosaurus rexes. This scene, simply put, owns your face. My level of excitement was already pretty high with my enjoyment of Jackson’s direction and Naomi Watts’ shrill scream as a beckon; so when Kong dropped in and knocked one rex out of the way with his foot and tackled the second, I slid closer to the edge of my seat. When he dropped Watts from his hand and caught her with his foot, I slid a little closer. When a third T-rex joined the fight, I was almost to the edge. When they fell off the cliff and fought for 2 minutes in the vines and Watts was perilously close to death, I nearly fell out of my seat. It was only after Kong had his encore fight with the final t-rex and wreaked its face for life, that I fell out of my seat, stood up, went to the ticket booth to pay an additional 10 dollars (as I thought the movie was worth $20). Uh, good times.

Bourne vs. Desh

I’m sorry to the fans of the Bourne trilogy, but 'Bourne Ultimatum' was actually the only Bourne movie that I enjoyed. Why didn't I like its predecessors? I have my reasons, and would gladly elaborate on them for those who care. But fans and non-fans alike, there is definitely one thing that we can agree on, the close quarters fight scene with Desh and Bourne was the epitome of ruthless. The gritty, true feel of the fight was what shocked me. For the first time in a long time, I felt as if this was actually the way a fight would play out between two highly trained agents. There were no wires, no overly fancy combat techniques; it was as if the two men were just doing whatever they could to survive. Grab a candle stick, grab a book, punch book into face, throw into wall, use whatever you can to kill your opponent before he kills you. And in the end, there is no grand shoot out or elaborate kick out the window; Desh is undone by a towel that Bourne uses to strangle him to death in a bath tub. Superbly gritty.

The hose fight of ‘Transporter 2’

Sure this was done in ‘Romeo must die’ well before 'Transporter 1' was even a thought, but sometimes it takes one movie to introduce a concept and another movie to improve upon it. This is the case with the hose fight in 'Transporter 2'. Looking back on it now the fight is a little out dated, but it was sweet when I first saw it. The quick whipping of the hose, the brutal punches to the throat, and the climax of turning the hose on and demolishing whatever will was left in the opponents. Brilliant! But lets be honest with ourselves, when has Statham ever let us down...

First encounter of the Spartans with the Persians in '300'

No action category can be brought up without the mention of ‘300’. Yes yes, the acting was bad and the story was simple, screw you. The story isn’t why anyone thought it was so great, this movie was 100% about the action. With stylistic direction and over the top testosterone, the first fight in ‘300’ goes down as one of my all time favorite experiences in a movie theater. I was literally giggling like a little school girl as Leonidas was captured in slow motion castrating a massive army of his enemy. Of course the slow motion shield-butt was the climax of the fight, but I enjoyed the scene from moment one. The Spartans form a wall of resistance to the Persians, a messenger rides to the front of the enemy hoard and says, “lay down your weapons” (I’m giggling already), a spear flies through the air and drills the Persian square in the chest, and Leonidas responds, “come get them”. Oh man, that is what I’m talking about. The army then rushes on in what should be an easy victory, but a few minutes later we get the great cinematic scene of the 300 unharmed, walking over a mountain of dead enemies as they push the ranks back. What I wouldn’t give to be a Spartan.

‘Terminator 2’ the fight in the steel mill

I know I’m bringing in this old timer from out of left field, but you can’t deny that some recognition is deserved here. Aside from being a breakthrough in computer animation, the liquid terminator was a pretty cool villain. Though the most referenced scene in the movie is the T-1000 chasing the police car and attacking it with his arm-hooks, my favorite scene in the movie was the fight in the steel mill after the T-1000 is frozen, shattered, melted, and reformed. This is the best robot fight, pre ‘I Robot’ that I had ever seen. They slam each other into walls, stab each other and in the case of the T-1000 completely overwhelm thier opponent. The cool reforming of body parts to be other body parts and the particularly awesome complete inverse of front to back was great. The sad part is that everyone including Arnold knew that he didn't have a shot at winning the fight. It’s sort of sad really. But awesome none-the-less.

The opening club fight of “Blade”

Though the Blade franchises has few redeeming qualities, the ones that exist are actually quite cool. One of these being the opening club fight in the first ‘Blade’. Not only a great way to introduce the character, the villains, and the special effects, but a great way to remind us that Wesley is alive despite being MIA since 'Demolition man' (please, let's ignore 'Too Wong Foo'). Though some of the action dynamics are outdated (bad guys waiting to be beaten up one by one), the fighting is not. These cool martial arts moves still hold the test of time and manage to bring a smile to my face even now. The shaky camera work is another cool feature that I always thought made action sequences slightly more exciting (though Bay and Neveldine take it to a seizure inducing level). And need I remind everyone about the sword! One of the best parts of this scene is when Blade unsheathes his sword, draws a line on the ground and demolishes the first person to cross it. Surprisingly, none of the other fight scenes amongst the three Blade movies manages to reach the level of this first fight. Too bad…

Well, that’s my top ten list. Obviously there are some pretty key members of the genera that are missing here, but why don’t you let me know your top ten below.
Full Review!

Ice Age 3: Dawn of the Dinosaurs(2009)

So much fun




Short

Great movie! Minus one or two inappropriate jokes, this is the most fun kid’s movie of the summer. It’s a roller-coaster of excitement that bests its predecessors by far. Not being a fan of the previous two installments, this movie was a delightful surprise. Good family fun recommended for those who enjoy animated movies.




Full


Simply put, I had a lot of fun watching this movie. The roller-coaster feel of the action sequences and the fun humor make this movie well worth the watch. And as Pixar has demonstrated before, animation is made even better with babies. Baby animals are cute whether they are animated or not. Though there is nothing historically acurate or geographically correct, about this cartoon, you’d have to be a pretty crotchety to hate it.

The plot

Sid and gang are back in another prehistoric adventure. With Manny and Ellie starting a family, and Diego returing to he wild, Sid has no one to hang out with. That is until he accidentally finds three dino eggs. Though the eggs are his best friends for a time, it's when the eggs hatch that the real fun begins. Having no place in the Ice Age, it is only a matter of time before momma dina seeks out her children. When Sid and the dino babies are kidnapped by mama dino, the rest of the crew must come together to serach for their friend in the land of the lost.

Reasons to see it

It’s adorable.
Ellie and Manny have a baby, Sid with the dino eggs, and the Scrat the saber toothed Squirrel gets a girlfriend, Scratte. All of these story fragments are cute and funny. And unlike its predecessors, everone is happy in this installment. No mammonth longing for his lost family, no conniving saber tooth, no world changing flood, etc. There is no excessive drama at all and none of the characters are ever helplessly in harms way. If there are ever moments of intensity, the situation is always made light by humor.

More Scrat!
I don’t know about you, but my favorite parts of the 'Ice Age' movies have always been the saber-toothed squirrel and his battle with acorn. Those who are with me will be delighted to know, that this movie literally features about 15 minutes of on screen time of the epic chase, and each showing is a smile inducing adventure. Things are made even more interesting now that he has competition. Scratte is smarter, faster, and more advanced than her male counterpart. Let the race begin. Does he finally get the acorn…you’ll have to watch the movie to find out.

It's fun!
While 'Harry Potter and the Half-blood Prince' was as boring as dirt (especially for those with a short attention span), 'Ice Age 3' is non-stop fun and visual stimulation. Afterall, kid's movies don’t generally have enough story to fill 2 hours, so much of the movie is just tomfoolery.

The Negatives

One or two child inappropriate jokes are the only blemishes on this kid’s movie. But I think this is something familes will have to get used to as it seems no kids movie is complete without some 'adult' humor. I think we can blame 'Shrek' for that.

In summary…

...I recommend this movie even to those who did not enjoy the previous films. This movie to me is 'Ice Age' done right.
Full Review!

Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen(2009)

Cinematic Review
Robots fighting for two hours straight with no attempt at a story or dialogue.  Really?



A Dude's Review
Two and a half hours of robots fighting!  Nuff said



Short
Wow, what a spectacle. As far as visual effects and robot action sequences go, This is the best movie ever made (that’s right, put aside that copy of the first “Transformers”). The movie is literally 2 hours of robots fighting on screen with about 30 minutes of dialogue. And it really isn’t until the very end in which the action becomes mundane, so my hat is off to the director in that respect. Unfortunately, this movie suffers from some very bad decisions. The most important being that the flim has a 'potty mouth'. Parents beware, movies are allowed to say the F-word once and still be PG-13. This movie takes advantage of the language leniency and makes curse words the punch line for many of its jokes. Aside from other less gross mistakes, the film suffers from poor dialogue, some bad acting and a stringy plot. Overall I enjoyed the film as a guilty pleasure and recommend it to all who know what to expect, but there is no doubt that the first movie was more well rounded and in my opinion better.




Full


This movie opens with a fantastic action sequence to suck you in, and ends with an awesome action sequence to leave you satisfied. But we all know that Michael Bay can play a symphony with special effects and slow motion, so there is no need to go on about this aspect of the film any further. Just know that it is amazing. What is worth mentioning is that the integration of comedy into the first "Transformers" was really enjoyable. The style of humor and the charm really added a level of entertainment to the film. However, despite trying to stay in the tone of the first movie, the second one often becomes silly. With moments of awkward jokes and in one instance a really odd story twist, the word ‘stupid’ sometimes comes to mind. But I can honestly say, no matter how many errors this movie makes, the action really makes up for it. I almost can’t get over how impressive it was, albeit very over-the-top.

The plot
Megatron is resurrected and the decepticons mount another attack on earth, and the autobots who protect it. The focus of this attack is to obtain an ancient relic of great power that will not only bring the decepticons supremecy, but will consume Earth in the process. With the U.S. Military and autobots allied, the war to protect Earth is massive and long.

Reasons to see it
The action sequences are just amazing. The computer animation is stunning and is put to great use in the second installment of what will likely be a long lasting franchise (doomed to overstay its welcome). The imagination behind the film is exemplified in the design of the 42 robots that we get to see on screen and in the unique way that each of them behaves in combat. Unlike "Wolverine" where two hours of fighting became boring and silly, this movie manages to keep the entertainment flowing as only Bay knows how. The choice to team up the autobots with the U.S. Military was a great one, it adds a whole new level to the type of action sequences we have. One thing that really impressed me about the fighting is that I never thought there could be gratuitous, animated, robot violence. Then I saw "Transformers 2". With slow motion, the crushing of heads and dismembering of machines can almost be sickening. But really cool none-the-less.

Optimus Prime. What a bad-@#* robot! For those who wanted to see Optimus tear stuff up, it is delivered in full and on steroids.

Though I personally do not have any attraction to her, Megan Fox is definitely a highlight for men. The film has no shame in giving her as many 'money shots' as it can justify. Slow motion running, awkward camera angles, and clothing that was picked up from the children’s section. For those who are hoping to see Fox exploited, your wish is Hollywood’s command. However, do not be fooled that she contributes anything to the film plot wise. The minute she opens her mouth, you are reminded of what a painfully bad actress she is. (I wonder how long Megan’s sex appeal will get her through the industry…probably forever with surgery these days).

The Negatives
Though the second film is rich with comedy, the charm of the humor that was enjoyed in the first film is completely removed from "Revenge of the Fallen". Julie White who plays Judy Witwicky, the mother of Sam (Shia LaBeouf) is the only saving grace here. She truly is adorable and had me smiling whenever she was on screen. But aside from her, the movie uses curse words and sex jokes as its major punch lines. Though I laughed, I feel that this humor has no place or at least should be minimized in a movie where the true target audience is children. I know the real Transformers fans will be people of the older age range, but we can all agree that a movie about giant robots maximizes profits by targeting a younger age group.

Some of the robot characters were either underdeveloped or just pointless. Don’t get me wrong, I want to see as many robots on screen as can be done, but sometimes I want quality over quantity. There are two robots in particular that stand out as terrible choices for eating up lots of screen time, Mudflap and Skids. These two robots are the “token black guy” of the film and are responsible for not only the most absurd statements in the film, but the most absurd visuals as well (seeing as one of them has a gold tooth). Though sterotypes are not always bad and I didn’t have a major problem with these two jokesters, they make me wonder what kind of stuff was left on the cutting floor of this production.

It is no secret that a third movie is already in the works for the franchise, so I feel no harm will come from me telling you that the ending was weak, very weak. Though it wasn’t as bad as the ever annoying “to be continued” (this movie does indeed 'end'), the flim blantantly tells you that another one is on the way. Thus, the audience doesn't get the closure that a movie ending should bring. It’s not that I don’t welcome a sequel, I just don’t like the vibe that the movie was just a long tv show. I could almost hear a random narrator saying, “tune in next week kids as the autobots stop the decepticon's new plan for taking over the world.”

In summary…
...the movie tops all other movies to date in the scope of its action sequences, and for that it is a must see. But do not make the mistake of expecting an Oscar Nominee (maybe except for 'special effects' and 'sound editing').

Full Review!

Finally, news about "The Game of Thrones" HBO adaptation!


Hollywood Reporter has given us something I have been wanting for quite sometime: News about "The Game of Thrones". The HBO series based on the George R.R. Martin books The Song of Ice and Fire is set to start filming in Ireland in October of this year.

Sean Bean (Borimir of "Lord of the rings") is to play the beloved Eddard Stark of Winterfell. Personally I think aside from the blonde hair (which strikes me as being more lannister), Bean is perfect. He has the chizzled features and the facial hair I imagined. I think some black hair dye will give him the dark hue of the Starks.Playing another dead guy Bean?
Mark Addy is set to play King Robert Baratheon. The only two places I know this guy from are Roland from a "Knight’s tale" and Fred in the atrocious second Flinstones movie ("Viva rock vegas"). I think this guy is actually a really good fit, as long as he can play the serious part better than he does comedy.Just imagine him in King's garb
Kit Harrington has been cast as Jon Snow. I don’t know anything about this Harrington fellow, but Jon is my character, so I pray that this no-name can represent. I have faith.
Harry Lloyd will play the power hungry, powerless, Viserys.
Jack Gleeson will play Joffery Baratheon, the son of King Robert and hier to the Throne of Swords.
The best news yet, Peter Dinklage is set to play the one and only Tyrion Lannister. Tyrion is my favorite character in the series, and Dinklage is my favorite dwarf. This must be destiny.The motherf***ing man

One aspect I am slightly pensive about is director Tomas McCarthy. Clearly Tom has talent, watch just a few minutes of "The Station Agent", or "The Visitor", and you can see it. However, neither of these movies is either epic or of the medieval tone. Don’t worry, I am keeping the faith because after all, who thought Jackson was going to do what he did.

I guess the worst news is that neither screenplay writer has anything of consequence under their belt; David Benioff ("Troy", "Stay", "X-men Origins”) D.B. Weiss ("The Game"). But keep the faith!

For those who aren't in the loop, The Song of Ice and Fire is a story that revolves around many great battles between seven great families (with that number growing) for control of the Iron Throne. Not only does the Iron Throne bestow power over the seven kingdoms, but it ensures survival through the looming 40-year winter to come.

For those who are in the loop, what do you think of the casting choices?
Full Review!

Production has begun on "The Hobbit"

Hobbiton
Finally, "The Hobbit" has begun production as hobbit holes are being built in Matamata, New Zealand. The film is scheduled to start shooting asap. There will be two films scheduled to be shot simultaneously: "The Hobbit" and it’s sequel(?). Since there is no sequel to The Hobbit (excluding LOTR), I think they are just breaking "The Hobbit" up into two movies for both better story telling and better profit. Peter Jackson and Fran Walsh of the "The Lord of the Rings" will be set as executive producers, but it is (da da da daaa) Guilermo del Toro that will be directing ("Pan's Labrinth" and "Hell Boy II"). They could not have picked a better director to take up the reigns! Only a director with a sense of epic action and a touch of horror could make The Hobbit films in the same tone as the LOTR movies; Toro can do just that. The movies are set to release in the upcoming two Decembers (2010 and 2011). For more information, read the official blog site The Hobbit Blog Full Review!

First Look at Johansson as Black Widow in Iron Man 2

Black Widow in black leatherHere is our first look at Scarlett Johansson as Black Widow in May 2010’s Iron Man 2. To be honest, I hate Scarlett (almost as much as I hate Colin Farrell…almost), but I have to admit the black leather may allow me to put aside my gripes for 2 hours. Below is a picture of Mickey Rourke in his role as Iron Man villain Whiplash. Seeing as the suit looks a little too dated to be competitive with Stark’s ‘titanium alloy’ suit, I assume what we see Rourke wearing is more like a prototype/early design. My guess is that we’ll see a suit worthy of taking on two adversaries by the end (Iron man and War machine).
Rourke is sure to be a hard hitterThough the plot of the movie is under wraps by director Jon Favreau, this is what we do know.

Tony Stark has fallen into a battle with alcoholism, which affects not only Stark industries but his career as a ‘super hero’. Taking advantage of this is Russian villain Ivan Vanko, who dons a suit equipped with two steel whips and an array of gadgets as his alter ego Whiplash. War machine will aid Iron Man in the fight, but it is the aid of Russian spy Natalia Romanova/Black Widow that is necessary for the victory (Why? Who knows.) Eventually good guys win, bad guys lose.

That’s all that is known officially about the script. However, I have some pretty probable speculations.

Justin Hammer is another villain who makes an appearance in the second movie. Justin is owner of Hammer industries, a competitor of Stark Industries. As Whiplash is associated with Hammer industries in the comics, my guess is that in response to Tony Stark’s revelation that he was Iron Man, Justin will launch Whiplash as a marketing strategy. If whiplash can defeat Iron Man, then it would show that his company had superior engineering strategies and would bring in clientele (probably putting Stark out of business). However, the competition will be steep as War machine is a guarantee for this second film. This leads me to believe that more likely than not, we are in for a multi-villain treat. I don’t think compelling action sequences can be made around one man taking on both Stark Suits. Since there is a hoard of villains associated with Hammer Industries in the comics, it is likely that we will see another 'bad guy'.

How does black widow fit into this? My guess is that Hammer industries will be based in Russia and that the company is doing some bad stuff under the table. Black widow will be sent by the Russian government to help Tony break the case wide open and bring the company down.

Now my real concern, where does SHIELD fit into this? The plot already sounds pretty dense, the last thing I want is the mistake of bloating the sequel with quantity over quality. My hope is that the film opens with some really cool SHIELD action sequence with some random villain cameo and then SHIELD leaves the movie. That would be enough to remind us that Iron Man is involved with SHIELD (for the "Avengers" movie), but not too much that SHIELD takes over the second movie, which should be about Iron Man. Perhaps SHIELD even suspends stark for his alcohol problem early on and then re-admits him at the end when he has defeated Whiplash.
I guess we’ll see. What do you guys think?
Where's Rhodes/War Machine?
Full Review!

A Look at “Avatar”!

Concept art of the Na'ViI don’t know how many of you are looking forward to James Cameron’s Avatar this December, but I’m going to assume it’s everyone. Never before have I heard a movie called a 'master piece' well before it was even in post production. Though hype is often mis-leading, I’m the fool who falls for it every time.
The guys with ‘The Insider’ have recently been privileged enough to get a screening of actual footage from the first hour of the movie, and my hype is hitting critical mass.

“I've just returned from a preview screening of James Cameron's hugely anticipated movie "Avatar" at the Cinema Expo in Amsterdam and I'm still feeling the after effects of this jaw-dropping experience…
In the first scene we see Sam Worthington's crippled ex-marine Jake Sully, who just arrived on the planet 'Pandora.'…Sigourney Weaver's Dr. Grace Augustine explains to Jake how the process of transporting your mind into an Avatar works. Although the scene is mostly exposition, we've got a good look at the lab and more importantly we get a first glimpse of the Avatars, the Na'Vi lookalikes. These tall blue creatures lie in water tanks, waiting for their human to 'jump' in their bodies…
It's the third scene where my heart begins to pound like crazy. Jake and Norm will inhabit their Avatar for the first time. They enter some sort of capsule and - flash – their mind enters the blue creatures, now lying on hospital tables. And not before long Avatar Jake wakes up. And it took my breath away. I thought--just like you guys--that I've seen it all with Gollum, or The Hulk, but Cameron has done it again. These creatures seem so real, that within minutes you forget you're watching an enormous and very blue CGI character. Even the eyes are totally convincing. The characters have real personalities and a soul.
In the next couple of scenes…my mind begins to work overtime. How the hell is it possible that I never once felt like I've been watching a movie where almost everything comes out of a computer?
…The last scene wasn't completed. What we saw, was sort of a video-game version of the mother of all battles. Countless numbers of Na'Vi riding their Banshees [dragon-like creatures] attack [an invading human] fleet. I can't wait to see the battle fully rendered.
Overall I was really impressed by what I saw. The effects are in a league of their own. After some disappointing or even pointless 3-D movies, "Avatar" may be the first movie where 3-D is properly utilized.”


For full article see: Avatar

Yep, that just happened. I don’t think I’ve been this excited about a science fiction/fantasy movie since “LOTR: The Two Towers” (I admit, “Revenge of the Sith” did not excite me until I actually saw it). Below are some pictures (concept art) to help put visuals to your excitement.

Banshees attacking a helicopter

Cool human military units

What do you guys think, will Cameron return to cinema—after a 12 year absence—as a legend?

Full Review!

The Spiderwick Chronicles(2008)


A Dude's Review
Wow, I did not expect it to be nearly this cool






Short

Wow, another kid's movie surprise. Though this movie is targeted for children, I was amazed at how enjoyable it was for anyone who enjoys fantasy. With relatively credible child actors and a fun story fueled with delightful special effects, the movie is very entertaining. Unlike 'The Chronicles of Narnia' which has subtle controversial messages and a whole lot of boring, 'Spiderwick Chronciles' delivers the fun. From sybling banter to goblin chases, the story holds its own as a children's 'Lord of the Rings'. If you need a movie for your children to watch that is wholesome escapism and won’t destroy their imaginations, this comes strongly recommended.




Full


Though I would like to say that I watch movies unbiased, in all honesty, I definitely go into children’s movies with nothing but skepticism. This makes it harder for them to climb the mountain of my criticism and get a rating worthy of being watched. Though harsh, this system is sure to be more honest and less forgiving. Afterall, just because a movie is for kids doesn’t mean it has the right to suck and still be praised. Furthermore, this system assures you that the rating you see for 'Spiderwick Chronicles' is not given lightly. 'Spiderwick Chronicles' manages to climb my mountain of doubt and then build a little fort at the top.

The plot

A mother moves herself and her three children to the boonies after a divorce with her husband. Having come from a city (New York) the kids resent their new situation, but the also understand that it isn’t entirely mother’s fault. However, their views of the situation change when Jared (Freddie Highmore) uncovers a secret book that details a miraculous world coinciding with ours. Unfortunatly, along with the mansion in which the children live, a secret was also inherited. Now the three children must protect themselves from and convince their mother that the most dangerous creature of the fantasy world exists, the troll Malgrath.

Reasons to see it

The imagination of the wole story is quite wonderful. Though I have likened the story to the 'Lord of the Rings', it is no where near as in depth; but the visuals and adventures are along the same vein (except toned down for children). It is also one of those stories that makes fun explinations for mischiefs that children are blamed for, like missing toys and bed wetting.

The visuals are great and add a fun dimension to a kid's film. Again the imagination is great, and the special effects really exemplify the world. If nothing else, this movie will have kids using their imaginations again instead of watching the terrible Saturday morning line up that constitutes cartoons these days.

The Negatives

It’s a kid's movie. And as such it has the faults of every kid's movie: some bad acting, some silly plot twists, and a contrived happy ending (not the entire ending, just a portion of it). I think the worst part about kid's movies is that the senior actors are usually put into silly situations that call for them to act really stupid. These situations just make you feel awkward for them.

But let’s put those expected downfalls aside. The only real problem I find with the movie is that not enough of the imaginative world is shown. They do show an extensive amount (much more than 'The Bridge to Terabithia') but by a quick look at the Field Guide, we can see that there is so much more that could have been shown. Especially since the visuals were great in this movie. I’m positive that more fantastical visuals would have contributed to the film. Perhaps there will be a sequel (I truly hope so).

In summary…

...This is a great kid's movie and I strongly recommend it to all who enjoy children's adventure and juvenile fantasy.
Full Review!

Mr. Brooks(2007)

Cinematic Review
Creepy






Short

Kevin Costner in one of his best roles yet. Though many aspets of the movie are average, there are a few things that are exceptional, one of them being Costner's performance. The movie is about a serial killer with a seemingly split personality who finds himself in a disturbing situation that has the potential to ruin his life. Though I enjoyed the film (as I do most movies), this one isn’t for everyone. Be cautious if you don’t like realistic violence, the concept of serial killers, or slightly disturbing situations.




Full


This movie isn’t 'American Psycho' (of which it will remind you), but it’s pretty disturbing none-the-less. I hate the idea that a killer could just choose me randomly off the street, learn about me and my daily routine, and then kill me for pure enjoyment. Sick. With Costner's portrayl of Mr. Brooks, a character ten times more deep and complicated than the plot he’s stuck into, you might develop a paranoid view of passerby on the sidewalk.

The plot

Mr. Brooks (Costner), a man who has a split personality named Marshall (portrayed by William Hurt), is a retired murderer once called the 'finger print killer'. However, after temptation hits too hard to resist, he finds himself back in the game. Unfortunatly he has become sloppy in his old age and leaves a trail that is not only followed by Detective Atwood (Demi Moore), but is photographed by a Mr. Smith. When Mr. Smith (Dane Cook), a photographer that has evidence linking Mr. Brooks to his latest kill, threatens to blackmail Brooks unless he teaches him the ways of murder, Mr. Brooks has to do what he knows how to best to escape both the cops and the hair-brain wannabe (Cook). Can Brooks keep his alter ego hidden from his family, or will this last kill be his undoing?

Reasons to see it

Kevin Costner's performance is phenomonal and deserves an Oscar nomination. His portrayl of the conflicted serial killer is beyond credible and really shows the depths of his acting ability as no movie before has demanded of him. How good is it? How good would it have to be to make you hope for the success of a cold, calculated, serial killer that murders lovers for his own sick pleasure? Yeah, that’s how good.

The story. Though it was not particularly well written or well thought out, it was very original. I’m not sure if that is 100% the word I’m looking for, but of all the killer thrillers that have been put out there, I don’t think I’ve seen one with a premise quite like this. Without a solid formula to stick to, the movie actually ended up being sort of unpredictable. And in this day and age, unpredictable is a godsend from the boring formulas that are being factory made every month.

The Negatives

Unfortunately, as great as I thought this movie was, there are enough downfalls to make me question my opinion.

Demi Moore is not good. I’m not sure if I’ve ever noticed this before, but for having such a strong name, she isn’t a particularly convincing actress. She isn’t bad, but she isn’t good. She’s just average. So what? I found that at many points in this film her character was rather unbelievable. In only two instances was this a script writing flaw, the rest were all Demi. Her strong feminine dialogue often fell flat and her true interest in the case was never detectable. Though it didn’t detract incurably from the movie, from her first appearance on screen the movie was removed from the candidacy list of 'top 10 killer thrillers'.

Danielle Panabaker, another actress that had no clue what she was doing on screen. Her only bit of great acting comes toward the end when it was very necessary for her to be believable, so I know she has the talent in her. But for most of the movie she is a rebelious child without conviction. Again, not the end of the world, but another notch down from the best.

Though direction choices were questionable at many points, there are two very sore thumbs that stick out in this film. To be honest, my heart sank during both scenes (especially the second one), they were atrocious. I don't know why the director choose to completely deviate from the style that the rest of the film took and do what he did. The details aren’t important, what you need to know is that the entire movie was 'blue' except in two spots where it was 'red'. When movies are expected to stay one color, it is usually not a good thing to deviate. I'm sure that was a terrible metaphore, but did you get it? Another notch down.

In summary…

A pretty good movie that has flaws too strong to warrant an overly positive rating. Thus it is a movie not wroth rushing to, but defintely worth renting.
Full Review!